Guest Contributor: Dr. Tom Nettles, 5-part Series on Evangelicalism


Gospel-Driven Blog is privileged to have Dr. Tom Nettles, Professor of Historical Theology at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, contribute a five part series on evangelicalism.

About Dr. Nettles

Dr. Nettles is widely regarded as one of the foremost Baptist historians in America. He came to Southern Seminary from the faculty of Trinity Evangelical Divinity School where he was Professor of Church History and Chair of the Department of Church History. He previously taught at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary and Mid-America Baptist Theological Seminary. Along with numerous journal articles and scholarly papers, Dr. Nettles is the author or editor of nine books. Among his books are By His Grace and For His Glory; Baptists and the Bible, the highly influential volume which he co-authored with L. Russ Bush; and Why I am a Baptist, co-edited with Russell D. Moore (see SBTS website).

About the series

The first two articles give a helpful, brief historical introduction concerning the term evangelical. The following three articles will explore three central ideas of evangelicalism, without which, as Dr. Nettles argues, evangelicalism could not exist.

The three central ideas to be explored are: The necessity of a word-centered approach to theology, ethics, preaching, and social engagement; The necessity of a Christ-centered approach to all these same areas; A further defining paramenter by pointing to the cross-centeredness of evangelicalism.

Evangelicalism- An Old History, Part 1

As is commonly known, the word “Evangelical” comes from the New Testament word for “Gospel.” Its verb form means to announce good news. The concept of evangelical has been used in Christian literature from the first century to the present, long before there was a subdivision movement within Protestantism known as the “Evangelical movement.”

During the early Reformation period the nomenclature referred particularly to the Lutheran churches, a device of their own to distinguish them as followers of the theology of Luther.

Those leading ideas that distinguished them from Roman Catholicism were the rejection of the authority of the pope, councils, and tradition for the sole authority of Scripture. On this point, they were not oblivious to the contributions made by Christian theologians or councils before the sixteenth century, and they clearly affirmed the orthodoxy of the person of Christ so clearly enunciated in the early councils. These, however, served not as authorities in themselves, but as lucid articulations of a biblical idea as opposed to the many inadequate and heretical presentations of the doctrines of Christ and the Trinity.

A second distinctive concept was their commitment to the finality of Christ as the one mediator between God and man. No need for intercession of the saints, Christ was sufficient. No need for a further sacrifice in the mass, Christ’s death accomplished all. No need for a vicar of Christ on earth, he communicates his blessings in the church through the ministry of the word.

Vitally connected to the second distinguishing trait, the third affirmed the finality of justification. Justification, inextricably connected to Christ’s obedience, was not seen as a process [at least after 1519] of gradually accomplished righteousness through accessing all the advantages of grace embedded within the sacramental system, but as a legal declaration from God. This declaration affirmed two things, forgiveness of sins and the imputation of righteousness. Luther also believed that such a view of salvation was made necessary because of the bondage of the human will to sin. In this he was rediscovering the evangelical Augustine. No merit was even possible for fallen man because sin penetrated in varying degrees every thought, motivation, word, and deed. With such an insuperable indebtedness to divine righteousness, what could possibly give hope? Only a divine plan for forgiveness and for a granting of righteousness arising from a gracious God could do any sinner good. Our obligation of obedience to divine law and the merited punishment for disobedience to it both were assumed by Christ. This declaration is neither immoral nor illegal, for God’s character has been honored with unalloyed and uncompromised perfection and the divine law vindicated fully in Christ’s voluntary assumption of our humanity and thus, as the last Adam, our debt. Thus God can be just and yet justify those that have faith in Christ.

The other Reformers, such as Zwingli, Calvin, Bucer, Bullinger, and Cranmer accepted these ideas and at points strengthened their expression and worked out their implications into church life. Among those that embraced and expanded these evangelical ideas were the Puritans in England and America and the Pietists of the late seventeenth-century Germany. Puritans and Pietists brought an emphasis on conversion with a careful delineation of its constituent elements. Along with this they emphasized assurance of salvation and the rigorous examination of evidences that an individual had indeed been converted.

This entire spectrum of belief—the orthodoxy of the early councils, the Reformation emphases on Scripture, Christ, and the cross, and the concern for individual conversion—all found solid confirmation in the First Great Awakening in America. The accumulation of these ideas, given expression progressively through Christian history, formed the basic theological and practical concerns that gave rise to American evangelicalism that also included an abiding commitment to the principle of the necessity of continuing reformation of the church and a hope for intense and rapid extension of Christ’s kingdom through revival.

Our next entry will show how “Evangelicalism” came to be seen as a particular type of Protestantism and what its leading concerns were.

Tom J. Nettles

Part 2: Evangelicalism—Recent History

3 Responses to Guest Contributor: Dr. Tom Nettles, 5-part Series on Evangelicalism

  1. HIke says:

    It is good to “hear” Dr. Nettles again!

    As one of his former students at Mid-America, I was brought to a full-fledged understanding of the Doctrines of Grace under his teaching. His enthusiasm awakened a love of Church history in me that has conformed by existence to those grand builders of our faith from long ago. His answers to my school-boy questions have provided an enduring lesson on how to assess situations and how to deal with puzzles in the lives of others. Once I questioned how Ambrose could speak so warmly evangelical for pages and then drop into a works-mixed-with-salvation section (for pages also), Dr. Nettles simply said, “I don’t know. We just trust that his [salvation] experience is truer than his theology.” He laid out a love for God, his person and reputation, that has carried me through these 24 years. He has created in me the basis for all I have come to understand about spiritual living in Christ.

    It is good to “hear” him again.

    Thank you for hosting his columns.

    Thank you for hosting his

  2. […] Reformed, Lutheran, Anglican) free of spiritual pride and elitism while remaining unified around evangelical doctrine. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Finally!My Theological Worldview […]

  3. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own
    blog and was wondering what all is needed to get
    setup? I’m assuming having a blog likme yurs would cost a pretty penny?
    I’m not very web smart so I’m not 100% certain.

    Any recommendations or advice would be greatly
    appreciated. Cheers

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: