Severe Language and the Gospel, Part 2

“8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. 9 As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.”

Last week, we began considering how to make sense of the severe language that we sometimes encounter in Scripture. We noted in particular how Galatians 1:8-9 constitutes one of the most severe statements in the NT.

The question to answer is: What are we to make of statements like Galatians 1:8-9? How are we to understand such severe language?

There are several important lessons to be learned from Paul’s severe language in Galatians 1:8-9.

First, we learn from this passage how little the gospel is actually understood.

Increasingly, focused, doctrinal teaching and preaching is little valued among believers and churches today. As a result, when a Bible teacher comes along and confronts doctrinal error (e.g, exposing The Shack), his devotion to the truth is mistaken for intolerance, hate speech, lack of love, divisiveness or pride.

However, Leon Morris makes the following observation concerning Paul’s words in Galatians 1:8-9, “denunciation of error is an index of devotion to the truth. He who cannot curse cannot bless…Only the person who has a firm grasp of the truth can discern what is erroneous,” (Galatians, p. 45).

The widespread acceptance and praise of a book like The Shack among professing, Bible-believing Christians is quite telling. The lack of discernment in regard to a work such at this reveals how little the gospel is actually understood. If believers and churches do not feel as deeply about the distortion of the gospel as Paul did, perhaps the problem is that they have not understood the gospel as clearly as Paul.

Mark this: When the doctrine of hell and God’s judgment is qualified, downplayed or abandoned, so to will be Christ and His gospel.

“We cannot repudiate Hell without altogether repudiating Christ.”

You cannot and will not be able to make sense of Paul’s severe denunciation of the Judaizers and their false gospel without possessing a firm grasp of the true gospel. Only by understanding the glorious truth of the genuine gospel will a person begin understand the severe condemnation of all false gospels.

The famous British author, Dorothy Sayers, speaking against the danger of abandoning the doctrine of hell and judgment wrote,

    “There seems to be a kind of conspiracy, especially among middle-aged writers of vaguely liberal tendency, to forget, or to conceal, where the doctrine of Hell comes from. One finds frequent references to the “cruel and abominable mediaeval doctrine of hell,” or “the childish and grotesque mediaeval imagery of physical fire and worms.”…

    But the case is quite otherwise; let us face the facts. The doctrine of hell is not “mediaeval”: it is Christ’s. It is not a device of “mediaeval priestcraft” for frightening people into giving money to the church: it is Christ’s deliberate judgment on sin. The imagery of the undying worm and the unquenchable fire derives, not from “mediaeval superstition,” but originally from the Prophet Isaiah, and it was Christ who emphatically used it…It confronts us in the oldest and least “edited” of the gospels: it is explicit in many of the most familiar parables and implicit in many more: it bulks far larger in the teaching than one realizes, until one reads the Evangelists [gospels] through instead of picking out the most comfortable texts: one cannot get rid of it without tearing the New Testament to tatters. We cannot repudiate Hell without altogether repudiating Christ,” (quoted by John Piper in “Dorothy Sayers on Why Hell Is a Non-Negotiable,” DG Website, Dorothy Sayers, A Matter of Eternity, ed. Rosamond Kent Sprague [Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1973], p. 86; emphasis mine).

To be continued…


5 Responses to Severe Language and the Gospel, Part 2

  1. Doug Avent says:

    Yep. The whole lack of the passion and fire to uphold the truth of the Gospel in the Church is a lack of understanding. Thanks for your ongoing concern and your ability to unpack Galatians.I pray that Hearts may be changed by your work or at least that it will further encourage those that understand to go out and preach the true Gospel more and more. Blessings, Doug

  2. Scott says:

    As severe as Paul’s language is concerning damnation he is as extreme in his proclamation of blessings, Rom 8:1. I really liked the idea expressed in the comment, “He who cannot curse cannot bless. All who hate the idea of Hell have nothing to worry about if they would just run to Christ. What a statement that “We cannot repudiate Hell without altogether repudiating Christ,” What need is there of a Savior if there is no Hell? In that same mindset what need then do we have for Christ and how miserable and worthless was His death if there is no Hell? Oh how Hell helps us understand the vastness of our sin and the amazing grace and love of Christ that He would “experience Hell” for us that we might live in his righteousness and glory for ever and ever!

    Jon, my 4 year old asked about Hell the other day and I struggled to explain it to him in a way that he can understand and a way that lead him to understand in a better way how he needs Christ. Do you have any recommendations on how I could better explain it to a 4 year old? He has asked about it a couple of nights this week.

  3. […] first lesson we noted is how Paul’s severe language demonstrates how little the gospel is actually […]

  4. […] first lesson we noted is how Paul’s severe language demonstrates how little the gospel is actually […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: